<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Watchdogonwallstreet's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The only show that exposes the truth behind Wall Street.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Robot Insurance and Reverse Mortgages by bbrashaw</title>
		<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/robot-insurance-and-reverse-mortgages/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>bbrashaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 20:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-20</guid>
		<description>THank you for the article, first of all. I agree with you that reverse mortgages and investments and annuities do not go hand in hand and in most cases are not the way to use proceeds from a reverse mortgage. I am in the business and I do all I can to know what the purpose of the reverse is before being comfortable moving forward with the loan. 

It is to be understood that although there are no monthly payments, a reverse mortgage is a loan with interest that must eventually be paid back. 

However there are a couple errors or misunderstanding of facts if your article. You say that interest rates on a reverse mortgage "the interest is much higher." This is actually typically untrue. The HECM, which is the FHA-insured loan, rates have been much much LOWER than traditional HELOCs. Reverse mortgage rates on the HECM (which is about 90% of all reverse mortgages) have been hovering between 3-4% over the last year. There are no conventional or HELOC loans with that low of rates these days. In some cases in fact if the appreciation of your home outpaces your interest rate on your reverse, you still gain equity in the home (granted at a much slower pace). 

And for clarity one of the reasons the upfront fees are high is because of the 2% FHA insurance required on the loan and the 2% origination fee which is quite typical for HECMs. The fees for a jumbo tend to be far less because they don't require the 2% insurance and often the origination is lower than 2%. The other fees are typical closing costs for all mortgages. 

Also you make mention of having to pay Home Owners Insurance and taxes. This is true of all mortgage programs, it comes with home ownership. You retaining ownership of your home is a benefit of the reverse mortgage. We don't take the house. You also make mention of foreclosure as a warning sign. The number of foreclosures on reverse mortgages is nearly zero. The lender makes every effort to make sure you remain in your house because after all that was the point of the reverse in the first place. 

Reverse mortgages are getting a bad rap due to a few bad apple insurance agents and financial advisors selling investment products after the fact and the public must understand that reverse mortgages and financial products are not interconnected and are completely independent of each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THank you for the article, first of all. I agree with you that reverse mortgages and investments and annuities do not go hand in hand and in most cases are not the way to use proceeds from a reverse mortgage. I am in the business and I do all I can to know what the purpose of the reverse is before being comfortable moving forward with the loan. </p>
<p>It is to be understood that although there are no monthly payments, a reverse mortgage is a loan with interest that must eventually be paid back. </p>
<p>However there are a couple errors or misunderstanding of facts if your article. You say that interest rates on a reverse mortgage &#8220;the interest is much higher.&#8221; This is actually typically untrue. The HECM, which is the FHA-insured loan, rates have been much much LOWER than traditional HELOCs. Reverse mortgage rates on the HECM (which is about 90% of all reverse mortgages) have been hovering between 3-4% over the last year. There are no conventional or HELOC loans with that low of rates these days. In some cases in fact if the appreciation of your home outpaces your interest rate on your reverse, you still gain equity in the home (granted at a much slower pace). </p>
<p>And for clarity one of the reasons the upfront fees are high is because of the 2% FHA insurance required on the loan and the 2% origination fee which is quite typical for HECMs. The fees for a jumbo tend to be far less because they don&#8217;t require the 2% insurance and often the origination is lower than 2%. The other fees are typical closing costs for all mortgages. </p>
<p>Also you make mention of having to pay Home Owners Insurance and taxes. This is true of all mortgage programs, it comes with home ownership. You retaining ownership of your home is a benefit of the reverse mortgage. We don&#8217;t take the house. You also make mention of foreclosure as a warning sign. The number of foreclosures on reverse mortgages is nearly zero. The lender makes every effort to make sure you remain in your house because after all that was the point of the reverse in the first place. </p>
<p>Reverse mortgages are getting a bad rap due to a few bad apple insurance agents and financial advisors selling investment products after the fact and the public must understand that reverse mortgages and financial products are not interconnected and are completely independent of each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dem/Dumb Debate by prospector4gold</title>
		<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/demdumb-debate/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>prospector4gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 14:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/?p=38#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Hey Chris, I'm a new listener to your radio show and I'm liking what I hear. I think you're the only person in the talk media that I've heard who picked up on the Obama/capital gains charade. James Taranto on is Best of the Web blog mentioned this yesterday. This sham has to be said out loud and clear, repeatedly. A RAISE IN THE CAPITAL GAINS RATE IS A TAX RAISE ON THE MIDDLE CLASS!!! Charlie Gibson gets it. Obama either does not get it or he is a con artist.

I like your alternative campaign slogan: Obama! BS we can believe in!

Keep up the good work.
The Prospector</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Chris, I&#8217;m a new listener to your radio show and I&#8217;m liking what I hear. I think you&#8217;re the only person in the talk media that I&#8217;ve heard who picked up on the Obama/capital gains charade. James Taranto on is Best of the Web blog mentioned this yesterday. This sham has to be said out loud and clear, repeatedly. A RAISE IN THE CAPITAL GAINS RATE IS A TAX RAISE ON THE MIDDLE CLASS!!! Charlie Gibson gets it. Obama either does not get it or he is a con artist.</p>
<p>I like your alternative campaign slogan: Obama! BS we can believe in!</p>
<p>Keep up the good work.<br />
The Prospector</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OBAMA FINANCIAL PLAN RELEASED&#8230;SHOULD BE CALLED RED DAWN II by david999</title>
		<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/obama-financial-plan-releasedshould-be-called-red-dawn-ii/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>david999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if it's on a par with Fidel yet, but getting there.  But it is definitely high comedy.  I especially like the part about "weatherization training"  ("advanced' even!).  But I guess anyone dopey enough to believe this stuff would need training in how to apply self-stick weatherstripping.

You might want to save a copy of the PDF file.  It will probably be revised when word gets out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s on a par with Fidel yet, but getting there.  But it is definitely high comedy.  I especially like the part about &#8220;weatherization training&#8221;  (&#8221;advanced&#8217; even!).  But I guess anyone dopey enough to believe this stuff would need training in how to apply self-stick weatherstripping.</p>
<p>You might want to save a copy of the PDF file.  It will probably be revised when word gets out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OBAMA FINANCIAL PLAN RELEASED&#8230;SHOULD BE CALLED RED DAWN II by haleadams</title>
		<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/obama-financial-plan-releasedshould-be-called-red-dawn-ii/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>haleadams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-11</guid>
		<description>It may not be "communism", poetryforpeace, but it's definitely collectivist, and rather unAmerican-- I'm getting a strong "The State is mother, the State is father" vibe from Obama's plan.

I don't know about the next guy (or gal), but I'd just as soon look after myself.  I have every incentive to do a GOOD job of doing so, unlike a bureaucrat in some alphabet-soup government agency, who gets paid whether he (or she) does a good job or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may not be &#8220;communism&#8221;, poetryforpeace, but it&#8217;s definitely collectivist, and rather unAmerican&#8211; I&#8217;m getting a strong &#8220;The State is mother, the State is father&#8221; vibe from Obama&#8217;s plan.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about the next guy (or gal), but I&#8217;d just as soon look after myself.  I have every incentive to do a GOOD job of doing so, unlike a bureaucrat in some alphabet-soup government agency, who gets paid whether he (or she) does a good job or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OBAMA FINANCIAL PLAN RELEASED&#8230;SHOULD BE CALLED RED DAWN II by poetryforpeace</title>
		<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/obama-financial-plan-releasedshould-be-called-red-dawn-ii/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>poetryforpeace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 03:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Communism? Doesn't this accusation sound like the lies from the sixties?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Communism? Doesn&#8217;t this accusation sound like the lies from the sixties?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OBAMA FINANCIAL PLAN RELEASED&#8230;SHOULD BE CALLED RED DAWN II by Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Checking out Obama&#8217;s economic plan</title>
		<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/obama-financial-plan-releasedshould-be-called-red-dawn-ii/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Air &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Checking out Obama&#8217;s economic plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] linked off the Obama campaign web site and was apparently authored and released on January 29. Christopher Markowski calls it &#8220;Red Dawn II&#8221; and says that it&#8217;s straight Communism. I&#8217;m not sure [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] linked off the Obama campaign web site and was apparently authored and released on January 29. Christopher Markowski calls it &#8220;Red Dawn II&#8221; and says that it&#8217;s straight Communism. I&#8217;m not sure [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OBAMA FINANCIAL PLAN RELEASED&#8230;SHOULD BE CALLED RED DAWN II by dgarman</title>
		<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/obama-financial-plan-releasedshould-be-called-red-dawn-ii/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>dgarman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I am glad there is at least one other person in this universe who understands this.  By try explaining that to any one else I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad there is at least one other person in this universe who understands this.  By try explaining that to any one else I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RETIREMENT RIDDLE by jamesthetoonist</title>
		<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/retirement-riddle/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesthetoonist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/retirement-riddle/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>It irks me to no end that the media allow this "Lock Box" notion to persist.  Further, why are the media not championing the repair of SS since they profess to being on the side of the little guy?  It is the great unwashed who are counting on SS and they will be hit the worst.

I'm taking your advice.  If you count on the gov't for anything expect to be dissappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It irks me to no end that the media allow this &#8220;Lock Box&#8221; notion to persist.  Further, why are the media not championing the repair of SS since they profess to being on the side of the little guy?  It is the great unwashed who are counting on SS and they will be hit the worst.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m taking your advice.  If you count on the gov&#8217;t for anything expect to be dissappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fed Meeting Today by doghog</title>
		<link>http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2007/09/18/fed-meeting-today/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>doghog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://watchdogonwallstreet.wordpress.com/2007/09/18/fed-meeting-today/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>These clowns on the tube are about as informative as most infomerical on the TV. Absoultely worthless.  I agree, asset allocation and diverification is key. Like you say Chris, slow and steady.  The many problem I have is everyone says this but when one starts looking for information on how to truely achieve this it is another matter.  Most info is 60% stocks and 30% bonds and 10% cash if you 45-55yo.  This is nice but not real informative.  What about real estate, minerals, intenational stocks, intenational bonds ect.  Where is the best place to find detailed information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These clowns on the tube are about as informative as most infomerical on the TV. Absoultely worthless.  I agree, asset allocation and diverification is key. Like you say Chris, slow and steady.  The many problem I have is everyone says this but when one starts looking for information on how to truely achieve this it is another matter.  Most info is 60% stocks and 30% bonds and 10% cash if you 45-55yo.  This is nice but not real informative.  What about real estate, minerals, intenational stocks, intenational bonds ect.  Where is the best place to find detailed information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
